Staff training makes all the difference when it comes to patient safety.

Patient Safety

Which 3 Factors Matter Most in Sterile Processing?

“If you can’t see inside of the device, how can you know it is truly safe to use on a patient?”

Ensuring patient safety in sterile processing requires that three key elements of the process work in concert, experts say.

People, processes and products must coordinate smoothly to keep a sterile processing department running effectively, according to a recent recap in Healthcare Purchasing News (HPN) of the Healthcare Sterile Processing Association’s annual conference, held this year in Las Vegas.

“Many breakdowns of a workflow or barriers to truly effective and efficient workflows tend to stem from improper or lack of training and education coupled with a lack of proper working equipment to expedite tasks,” Rebecca Peplau, a central sterilization department manager in Augusta, Maine, said in an HPN interview.

Decontamination training, for example, can be a slow process. But failures in the process can massively add to workloads, she notes.

Peplau also described ongoing challenges with instructions for use (IFUs), a topic that both the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC) have addressed recently.

_____________________________________________________

Related Content: IFU Improvements Sterile Processors Would Like to See

                               APIC Survey: IFUs Must Be Improved

_____________________________________________________

One idea: U.S. hospitals should consider adopting European standards such as regularly testing items for residual protein as they come out of washers.

In a Beyond Clean podcast, Rory Burke, who was a medical supply technician at a VA hospital in Montana at the time of the recording, said his department does mandatory testing on all its endoscopes. Protein residue testing identifies both living and dead organisms across a wide spectrum of proteins, so it picks up even neutralized bioburden that is still present.

Also, given that some IFUs require use of a borescope, Peplau thinks it should be a mandatory piece of equipment.

“If you can’t see inside of the device, how can you know it is truly safe to use on a patient?” she asked in HPN.

More Infection Prevention Articles
Why Medical Technologists Should be Considered for IP Roles
Prevention Strategies
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the healthcare worker shortage and infection preventionists are no exception.
What to Know About ANSI/AAMI ST108
Prevention Challenges
“Water is actually really complex in its chemistry and depending on where you are geographically, the water quality can be very different,” says the co-chair of a working group authoring the new standard.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
Healthcare and med-tech companies are striving to be sustainability leaders.

Environmental Impact

Med-tech and healthcare companies are among those on the prestigious list, recognized for modifying products with sustainability in mind.

Staff training makes all the difference when it comes to patient safety.

Patient Safety

It all starts with your staff and the training they receive.

A survey of infection preventionists found that product IFUs are sometimes unclear

Public Health

Patient safety depends on it, infection preventionists say.