A hybrid model may have financial benefits.

Analyzing Value

Study Seeks ‘Cut-Off’ Point for Single-Use Hybrid Model

A high-volume center with more than 200 patients annually could perform more than 90 percent of ureteroscopies with a single-use device and see financial benefits over a reusable option.

Single-use ureteroscopes offer benefits such as always being available, sterility, and eliminating costly and labor-intensive reprocessing. Their reusable counterparts are known to be fragile and require regular maintenance and repairs.

But while some benefits of single-use ureteroscopes may be clear, their cost effectiveness has been debated.

With so many cost drivers for endoscopy, including reprocessing, repairs, and maintenance — not to mention the endoscopes themselves — per-procedural costs will vary largely by volume. These are important considerations for any institution considering a hybrid approach to adopting single-use ureteroscopy, according to a new study in the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

The authors of the study created a model that estimates the “cut-off value,” or the number of kidney stone management procedures performed with a reusable ureteroscope for the fixed costs of purchasing, reprocessing, and maintenance to be worth it. They write that reaching the cut-off value is the only way for a hybrid single-use and reusable system to benefit a facility financially.

Results will differ, the researchers argue, between public or private institutions, procedure volume, or reprocessing methods.

Four public hospitals were profiled to demonstrate procedure volume’s impact on cut-off value. The study showed that low-volume centers performing fewer than 30 ureteroscopies per year benefitted financially from a full transition to single-use.

Additionally, a high-volume center with more than 200 patients annually could perform more than 90 percent of ureteroscopies with a single-use device and see financial benefits over a reusable option.

For more middle-of-the-road centers, the results were less clear, according to the study. The cut-off numbers, rather than a set number, ranged widely. 

A hybrid model must be preplanned and take into account caseload as well as sterilization processes, the authors noted.

More Health Economics Articles
Here’s How Much Improper Waste Disposal Costs U.S. Hospitals
Supply Costs
Endoscopy is part of the problem – a survey of doctors, nurses, and technicians found that most are unaware of the correct protocol for disposing accessories, including those used to take samples during a bronchoscopy.
How the Growing Global AMR Threat Adds to Endoscopy Costs
Supply Costs
Many hospital-acquired infections are caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and require intense antibiotic treatment. Should comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship programs include proper infection prevention protocols for handling and using devices like bronchoscopes?
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
Study: BAL samples that reveal high fungal and bacterial loads in COVID patients with ARDS are indicators of poor outcomes.

Patient Safety

A study, out of Amsterdam, was designed to assess the relationship between lung microbiota and clinical outcomes of COVID-19-related ARDS.

SARS-CoV-2 has played viral muse when it comes to publication of otolaryngology articles.

Public Health

The global pandemic has boosted the volume, citations and attention for both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19-related otolaryngology journal articles.

Experts: ‘How Do We Prove Clean is Clean?’

Prevention Strategies

The only agreed-upon endoscope reprocessing standard, experts note, is to follow the manufacturers’ instructions for use — but those IFUs can contain hundreds of steps and can be impossible for staffers to follow down to the letter.