A hybrid model may have financial benefits.

Analyzing Value

Study Seeks ‘Cut-Off’ Point for Single-Use Hybrid Model

A high-volume center with more than 200 patients annually could perform more than 90 percent of ureteroscopies with a single-use device and see financial benefits over a reusable option.

Single-use ureteroscopes offer benefits such as always being available, sterility, and eliminating costly and labor-intensive reprocessing. Their reusable counterparts are known to be fragile and require regular maintenance and repairs.

But while some benefits of single-use ureteroscopes may be clear, their cost effectiveness has been debated.

With so many cost drivers for endoscopy, including reprocessing, repairs, and maintenance — not to mention the endoscopes themselves — per-procedural costs will vary largely by volume. These are important considerations for any institution considering a hybrid approach to adopting single-use ureteroscopy, according to a new study in the Journal of Clinical Medicine.

The authors of the study created a model that estimates the “cut-off value,” or the number of kidney stone management procedures performed with a reusable ureteroscope for the fixed costs of purchasing, reprocessing, and maintenance to be worth it. They write that reaching the cut-off value is the only way for a hybrid single-use and reusable system to benefit a facility financially.

Results will differ, the researchers argue, between public or private institutions, procedure volume, or reprocessing methods.

Four public hospitals were profiled to demonstrate procedure volume’s impact on cut-off value. The study showed that low-volume centers performing fewer than 30 ureteroscopies per year benefitted financially from a full transition to single-use.

Additionally, a high-volume center with more than 200 patients annually could perform more than 90 percent of ureteroscopies with a single-use device and see financial benefits over a reusable option.

For more middle-of-the-road centers, the results were less clear, according to the study. The cut-off numbers, rather than a set number, ranged widely. 

A hybrid model must be preplanned and take into account caseload as well as sterilization processes, the authors noted.

More Health Economics Articles
Webinar: Comparing the Health Economics of Reusable vs. Single-use Bronchoscopes
Supply Costs
The fourth installment in the 'Bronchoscopy During COVID-19' series explores some important patient safety and financial considerations to take into account during these economically uncertain times brought on by SARS-CoV-2.
Improper Waste Disposal Costs Millions at U.S. Hospitals
Supply Costs
A survey of gastroenterologists and nurses found most are unaware of the correct way to dispose of endoscopic accessories. And incorrectly sorting those accessories as regulated medical waste increases costs as well as the environmental footprint of hospitals.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy

Endoscopy Tech

A new system enables urologists to perform various endoscopic procedures with nothing more than a scope and their smartphone.

CRC screening to begin at age 45.

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Applications

GI endoscopists celebrate updated guidance for colorectal cancer screening to begin at 45.

Challenges in device reprocessing are related to the lack of connection that hospital administrators and the public at large make between the resources given to our teams and the ultimate quality of surgical instruments available for every procedure.

Preventing Infection

Bigger hospitals typically offer more complex services, putting added strain on reprocessing departments — and the quality of reprocessing depends on the resources made available to the teams that do that work.