Flexible and rigid bronchoscopes have been used together with positive results around the world.

Patient Safety

Webinar: Flexible Bronchoscopy vs. Rigid Bronchoscopy, or Both?

“We have found that the developments in single-use scopes have actually helped us to do these procedures without damaging our supply of scopes."

Clinicians are performing an expanding range of procedures with flexible bronchoscopes that once were the sole purview of rigid bronchoscopy.

Success in doing so depends on factors such as training, comfort, experience and resources, said Dr. Brian Shaller, an interventional pulmonologist at Stanford University, in a recent Society for Advanced Bronchoscopy webinar.

“A rigid bronchoscope is a conduit and allows for a high degree of ease in swapping out tools or using multiple tools at once,” he said. ”Some tools are not readily compatible with a flexible scope. This category is dwindling over time, but silicone stents are one example of something that’s really not adaptable to non- rigid bronchoscopy.”

Shaller and Dr. Joon Chang, also a Stanford interventional pulmonologist, made the case for circumstances in which rigid bronchoscopes are better for patients — if bleeding is expected, for instance, or if silicone stenting is being done or when they simply are the only option for a procedure.

Many instances in which rigid bronchoscopy is performed involve airway obstruction, Shaller noted.

The doctors want their interventional pulmonology fellows to perform at least 50 cases using a rigid bronchoscope, in line with the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) IP Fellowship Accreditation Standards.

Shaller’s practice has started to use single-use endoscopes almost exclusively in their cases where a rigid bronchoscope is used as a conduit, in order to avoid damaging expensive reusable scopes, he said.

“We have found that the developments in single-use scopes have actually helped us to do these procedures without damaging our supply of scopes,” Shaller said.

Flexible and rigid scopes also are being used together with positive results elsewhere in the world.

“Both flexible and rigid modalities can and often have to be used in conjunction to treat central airway diseases,” doctors from Spain and Greece wrote in European Respiratory Review. “Combining multiple ablative modalities with flexible and/or rigid instruments may result in optimal patient outcomes.”

Watch a replay of the webinar below. Shaller and Chang are both Ambu consultants.

More Pulmonology Articles
Are You Following The Right Pulmonology Influencers?
Best Practices
For a broader look at social media in the medical world, the Healthcare Hashtag Project describes itself as a platform that connects doctors, caregivers, patient advocates and other providers to relevant conversations and communities.
Healthcare Shortage Means High Caseloads for Physicians
Public Health
A ranking of specialties by caseload answers the question of which physicians are responsible for the highest number of patients. Wonder where your specialty comes in?
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
How Much Does It Really Cost to Own Endoscopes?

Value-Based Care

Ownership costs are hidden in capital accounts, expensive service contracts and repair agreements that are capitated, a medical device industry executive writes.

A new role for single-use bronchoscopes in helping detect lung cancer

Bronchoscopy Procedure

Lung cancer’s stealth strategy to lie in wait can be derailed with early detection — the kind of diagnosis that robotic bronchoscopy, with the help of single-use bronchoscopy, can help make.