Flexible and rigid bronchoscopes have been used together with positive results around the world.

Patient Safety

Webinar: Flexible Bronchoscopy vs. Rigid Bronchoscopy, or Both?

“We have found that the developments in single-use scopes have actually helped us to do these procedures without damaging our supply of scopes."

Clinicians are performing an expanding range of procedures with flexible bronchoscopes that once were the sole purview of rigid bronchoscopy.

Success in doing so depends on factors such as training, comfort, experience and resources, said Dr. Brian Shaller, an interventional pulmonologist at Stanford University, in a recent Society for Advanced Bronchoscopy webinar.

“A rigid bronchoscope is a conduit and allows for a high degree of ease in swapping out tools or using multiple tools at once,” he said. ”Some tools are not readily compatible with a flexible scope. This category is dwindling over time, but silicone stents are one example of something that’s really not adaptable to non- rigid bronchoscopy.”

Shaller and Dr. Joon Chang, also a Stanford interventional pulmonologist, made the case for circumstances in which rigid bronchoscopes are better for patients — if bleeding is expected, for instance, or if silicone stenting is being done or when they simply are the only option for a procedure.

Many instances in which rigid bronchoscopy is performed involve airway obstruction, Shaller noted.

The doctors want their interventional pulmonology fellows to perform at least 50 cases using a rigid bronchoscope, in line with the American Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (AABIP) IP Fellowship Accreditation Standards.

Shaller’s practice has started to use single-use endoscopes almost exclusively in their cases where a rigid bronchoscope is used as a conduit, in order to avoid damaging expensive reusable scopes, he said.

“We have found that the developments in single-use scopes have actually helped us to do these procedures without damaging our supply of scopes,” Shaller said.

Flexible and rigid scopes also are being used together with positive results elsewhere in the world.

“Both flexible and rigid modalities can and often have to be used in conjunction to treat central airway diseases,” doctors from Spain and Greece wrote in European Respiratory Review. “Combining multiple ablative modalities with flexible and/or rigid instruments may result in optimal patient outcomes.”

Watch a replay of the webinar below. Shaller and Chang are both Ambu consultants.

More Pulmonology Articles
Webinar: Redefining What’s Possible with Single-Use Bronchoscopes
Bronchoscopy Procedure
“The gap is closing between single-use flexible bronchoscopes and reusable bronchoscopes, if it hasn’t already closed completely,” says Dr. Jonathan Kurman, an interventional pulmonologist, in a new webinar presented by the Society for Advanced Bronchoscopy and sponsored by Ambu.
In Search of Best Practices For Training Bronchoscopists
Best Practices
A better understanding of how bronchoscopy is supervised could improve how bronchoscopy is taught, researchers write in a study of how attending pulmonologists teach fellows.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
Experts Debate Single-Use Duodenoscope Accessories

Preventing Infection

They agree on one thing: the design of reusable duodenoscopes make them to hard to clean correctly.

Single-use rhinolaryngoscopes surpassed their reusable counterparts when it comes to organizational benefits.

Performing Procedures

Clinicians perceived single-use rhinolaryngoscopes as having organizational advantages over their reusable counterparts.

A full team of stakeholders should participate when it comes to making a purchasing decision about a reusable vs. single-use endoscope.

Public Health

Amber Wood, AORN's senior perioperative practice specialist, emphasizes the need to include educators and to weigh cost, environmental impact, and maintenance when choosing between single-use and reusable endoscopes.