Endoscope reprocessing poses unique challenges for technicians.

Patient Safety

‘You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know’: Common Misconceptions About Endoscope Reprocessing

Common misconceptions on the guidelines and protocols among reprocessing personnel increase risk of patient cross-contamination.

Knowledge gaps on proper cleaning and surveillance techniques lead to decontamination failures in endoscope reprocessing. There are common misconceptions on the guidelines and protocols among reprocessing personnel that increase risk of patient cross-contamination.

This is according to a review article from Michelle Alfa, CEO of AlfaMed Consulting, who has more than 30 years research experience in medical device reprocessing.

The ongoing quest to understand endoscope reprocessing failures to reduce patient cross-contamination risk has included several studies analyzing the human factors that play into reprocessing success. Contributing factors previously studied include challenging work conditions for reprocessing technicians and pressure for a quick turnaround from physicians that force technicians to skip steps in the process.

Alfa’s latest review article addresses the lack of understanding of how best to perform crucial reprocessing steps, like manual cleaning, microbial surveillance testing and proper drying and storage techniques.  

Manual cleaning has long been understood to be the most crucial reprocessing step. If contaminants remain on endoscope working channels prior to high-level disinfection, they may not be removed by the AER.

Alfa’s review – published in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in August 2020 under the title, “Quality Systems Approach for Endoscope Reprocessing: You Don’t Know What You Don’t Know!” –  notes a wide variance in manual clean compliance across endoscopy suites. Ongoing monitoring of this step is essential but not currently done, she says.

In the case of monitoring manual cleaning, endoscopy units often use microbial surveillance tests like rapid ATP tests after high-level disinfection (HLD) to check for dangerous organisms. These types of tests, however, are not sensitive enough to detect microorganisms post-HLD, Alfa notes. Rapid ATP tests should be performed following manual cleaning and would help determine if it needed to be repeated prior to HLD.

Another popular misconception, Alfa writes, is that automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) can adequately dry endoscope working channels with an alcohol flush and an air flush post-HLD. This leads to a false sense of security and too many endoscopes stored with moisture levels that can facilitate biofilm growth.

Endoscope reprocessing is a long, complex process requiring 50 to 100 steps that must be carefully followed. Endoscopes – such as bronchoscopes, duodenoscopes, cystoscopes, and colonoscopes – are difficult to clean and disinfect due to their delicate nature and long, narrow working channels. Inadequate reprocessing can put patients at risk of cross-contamination, as numerous outbreaks have been traced back to contaminated “patient-ready” scopes.

Neither society guidelines nor manufacturer endoscope instructions for use offer a standard requirement for reprocessing monitoring in endoscopy units in North America, Alfa writes. That makes it difficult to know the protocols and practices that need to be improved if they are not audited adequately or regularly.

“Endoscopy clinics in North America (large and small) do not perform much monitoring,” Alfa concludes, “and as such they do not know how well or how poorly they are doing with respect to many of these disconnect issues (i.e. ‘you don’t know what you don’t know’).”

Recent Infection Prevention Articles
Endoscope-Related Infection: A Look to the Future
Prevention Strategies
Exogenous infections relating to contaminated endoscopes have been historically difficult to quantify. A recent systematic review offers a look at potential solutions to reducing the risk of patient infection from cross-contamination.
PPE in Reprocessing: Vital for Safety and Eliminating Endoscope Contaminants
Prevention Challenges
Endoscope reprocessing involves a complicated series of between 50 and 100 steps depending on the device instructions for use and society guidelines adopted by the institution. Among the dozens of steps needed are several PPE changes to protect the integrity of the cleaning process.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
ICU

Preventing Infection

New research out of Northwestern University on performing bronchoscopy procedures during COVID-19 shows results that are “reassuring to the bronchoscopist community.”

aScope 4 RhinoLaryngo Intervention prodcedure

Analyzing Value

A study found the Ambu® aScope™ 4 RhinoLaryngo superior in set up and convenience and better overall than reusable competitors. The Ambu device also offered comparable performance to reusables in ergonomics and maneuverability and was found to be more cost effective.

Teleurology

Emerging Technologies

Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth had been used sparingly in urology. Urologists at the University of Virginia found it to be feasible and highly accepted by patients.