New AORN guidelines for reprocessing flexible endoscopes are designed to be achievable and to represent what is optimal.

Preventing Infection

AORN’s Four Revised Guidelines to Improve Flexible Endoscope Safety

“We know flexible endoscopes are associated with far more outbreaks than any other medical or surgical device ­— these complex devices require equally complex processes for effective cleaning and sterilization or high-level disinfection (HLD)."

Better communication with decontamination personnel, a stronger stand on borescope inspection and more rigorous drying practices are among AORN’s latest revised guidelines for processing flexible endoscopes.

“We know flexible endoscopes are associated with far more outbreaks than any other medical or surgical device ­— these complex devices require equally complex processes for effective cleaning and sterilization or high-level disinfection (HLD),” says Amber Wood, a senior perioperative practice specialist who authored the new guidelines, in Periop Today, which is AORN’s bi-weekly digital newsletter.

AORN’s new guidelines join the recently issued ANSI/AAMI ST91 update to standards for reprocessing endoscopes which classifies flexible endoscopes as “high-risk” and needing sterilization rather than high-level disinfection to adequately rid them of contaminants that can harm patients. The new guidance comes at a time when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has issued several safety alerts, and there is heightened scrutiny on contaminated endoscopes and the risks of reprocessing.

The new guidelines, approved by the AORN Guidelines Advisory Board and which became effective on Sept. 15, are intended to “be achievable and represent what is believed to be an optimal level of practice.” Because the changes are so new, there has not been significant documented reaction in the field so far.

Although new research on safer practices for sterile processing has prompted much new guidance, Wood recommends adopting these four major AORN revised guidelines for the greatest impact.

  1. Refine the hand-over process from transporter to decontamination personnel

That communication should include the time point-of-use treatment was completed and provide details on any complicating factors that necessitate additional cleaning.

  1. Use a borescope to inspect accessible channels before sterilization or HLD

Borescopes can find damage or debris within internal channels that would otherwise go undetected

  1. Use cleaning verification tests to verify manual cleaning before sterilization or HLD

Visual cleaning is insufficient to determine whether complex devices like flexible endoscopes are clean.

  1. Dry HLD-processed flexible endoscopes in accordance with manufacturer’s IFU with pressure-regulated instrument air or HEPA-filtered air for at least 10 minutes or until no visible moisture remains.

Moisture that remains in a scope leads to microbial growth and biofilm formation during storage.

AORN is providing an Implementation Road Map to help healthcare facilities decide what measures to take to improve reprocessing at their facility.

Inadequate reprocessing can put patients at risk of cross-contamination, with outbreaks traced back to contaminated “patient-ready” scopes.

Michelle Alfa, CEO of AlfaMed Consulting, who has more than 30 years research experience in medical device reprocessing, addressed how to best perform reprocessing in a recent review article.

If contaminants remain on endoscope working channels prior to high-level disinfection, they may not be removed by the AER, Alfa writes.

Misconceptions abound when it comes to reprocessing and can contribute to increased risk of patient contamination, she and others say.

Endoscopy units often use microbial surveillance tests like rapid ATP tests after high-level disinfection (HLD) to check for dangerous organisms, but those tests are not sensitive enough to detect microorganisms post-HLD, according to Alfa.

Another popular misconception is that automated endoscope reprocessors (AERs) can adequately dry endoscope working channels with an alcohol flush and an air flush post-HLD.

Human factors also can play a role in cross-contamination, according to studies. They include challenging work conditions and pressure for a quick turnaround from physicians, which sometimes force technicians to skip steps.

More Infection Prevention Articles
Why Medical Technologists Should be Considered for IP Roles
Prevention Strategies
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the healthcare worker shortage and infection preventionists are no exception.
What to Know About ANSI/AAMI ST108
Prevention Challenges
“Water is actually really complex in its chemistry and depending on where you are geographically, the water quality can be very different,” says the co-chair of a working group authoring the new standard.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
Healthcare and med-tech companies are striving to be sustainability leaders.

Environmental Impact

Med-tech and healthcare companies are among those on the prestigious list, recognized for modifying products with sustainability in mind.

Staff training makes all the difference when it comes to patient safety.

Patient Safety

It all starts with your staff and the training they receive.

A survey of infection preventionists found that product IFUs are sometimes unclear

Public Health

Patient safety depends on it, infection preventionists say.