Developing A Roadmap to Standardized Endoscope Reprocessing

Preventing Infection

Developing A Roadmap to Standardized Endoscope Reprocessing

"If the leader is constantly on the defensive with the clinical team or hospital leadership team, whether it's damaged scopes or quality issues, then you're living in that world where you're not allowed to have the freedom to standardize those processes."

Healthcare providers are urging facilities to update and adjust their endoscope reprocessing protocols — and standardizing these efforts whenever possible to accommodate new information and integrate input from personnel and specialists.

That’s according to a recent article in Outpatient Surgery Magazine, which is produced by AORN, a leading perioperative nursing organization devoted to defining evidence-based standards that keep patients and healthcare workers safe.

This kind of standardization can result in a better line of defense against patient safety and efficiency issues brought on by factors such as out of date instructions for use (IFUs), poor training and lack of certifications.

Challenges persist, however. Damien Berg, the vice president of strategic initiatives at the Healthcare Sterile Processing Association (HSPA), pointed out one frequent misstep: Leaders tend to function in a “firefighting mode,” a reactive stance that prioritizes solving immediate issues over proactively standardizing procedures.

"If the leader is constantly on the defensive with the clinical team or hospital leadership team, whether it's damaged scopes or quality issues, then you're living in that world where you're not allowed to have the freedom to standardize those processes," Berg told the magazine.

That's crucial because you have to understand what's being done incorrectly — and why it is occurring — to put new processes in place to prevent these kinds of problems and effectively perform your facility’s protocols.

Transitioning from Reprocessing to Single-Use Endoscopes

The starting point when reprocessing endoscopes, according to Berg, are the latest guidelines in tandem with manufacturer's IFUs. This is crucial until a universal checklist for reprocessing endoscopes is established to eliminate any confusion.

Other standardization efforts should cover:

  • The reprocessing chain of command, and potential breaks in that chain
  • Utilizing technology to streamline processes and make life easier for technicians
  • Conducting regular procedure and process reviews
  • Creating a robust training and education curriculum

Another variable, though not covered by the magazine, is transitioning to single-use endoscopes, which don’t need to be reprocessed because they are used once. While the risk of device-related infection is considered to be rare, regulators have focused attention on possible scope contamination issues and have recommended transitioning to innovative single-use designs.

Related Stories 

What is the Most Overlooked Aspect of Endoscope Reprocessing

Experts: How Do We Prove Clean is Clean? 

5 Tools for One of Reprocessings' Most Important Steps 

More Infection Prevention Articles
Why Medical Technologists Should be Considered for IP Roles
Prevention Strategies
The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the healthcare worker shortage and infection preventionists are no exception.
What to Know About ANSI/AAMI ST108
Prevention Challenges
“Water is actually really complex in its chemistry and depending on where you are geographically, the water quality can be very different,” says the co-chair of a working group authoring the new standard.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy
Healthcare and med-tech companies are striving to be sustainability leaders.

Environmental Impact

Med-tech and healthcare companies are among those on the prestigious list, recognized for modifying products with sustainability in mind.

Staff training makes all the difference when it comes to patient safety.

Patient Safety

It all starts with your staff and the training they receive.

A survey of infection preventionists found that product IFUs are sometimes unclear

Public Health

Patient safety depends on it, infection preventionists say.