Flexible ureteroscopes are used for RIRS.

Emerging Technologies

How Does Single-Use Stack Up in RIRS?

“Single-use devices guarantee all patients the same effectiveness; this is not necessarily the case for multi-use devices, which are used many times over their lifetime and which gradually lose their image quality and their effectiveness.”

The effectiveness of disposable ureteroscopes is comparable to reusable devices when used in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS).

This is according to a new study published in Research and Reports in Urology, an open access journal.

In fact, the stone free rates for patients after RIRS were slightly lower in patients who had undergone the procedure with the single-use option (90 percent) against those with the reusable (86.6 percent).

“Single-use devices guarantee all patients the same effectiveness; this is not necessarily the case for multiuse devices, which are used many times over their lifetime and which gradually lose their image quality and their effectiveness,” the authors conclude.

The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of reusable flexible ureteroscopes and a disposable model in for patients undergoing RIRS. Eligible patients were randomized into two groups  90 who underwent RIRS performed with a reusable ureteroscope and 90 with the single-use device — at participating institutions between January 2018 and July 2019. Demographics, stone features, and pre-operative urine cultures were all comparable between the groups.

The study found several benefits to performing RIRS with a single-use ureteroscope, including:

  • Lower overall complication rates
  • Fewer instances of postoperative infection and fever
  • No reported cases of urosepsis
  • Less time in the hospital post-procedure

While the authors calculated the cost of the disposable ureteroscopes to be “marginally more expensive," reusable ureteroscopes have a “more variable cost,” according to the authors. These variable costs stem from damage and the related repair expenses, or need for antibiotic therapy following use of a reusable device.

The study also notes the challenges in effectively cleaning reusable flexible ureteroscopes. Reprocessing is a long, complex procedure that includes precleaning at the bedside, leak testing, manual cleaning, high-level disinfection, rinsing, drying, and proper storage.

“Despite great sterilization efforts, the effectiveness of the procedure is still insufficient, which could lead to the contamination of the instruments,” the study says.

A separate recent clinical trial recently found single-use ureteroscopes to offer significant cost savings in addition to satisfactorily completing all procedures they needed to, as compared to reusable devices.

More Urology Articles
‘Practical, Inexpensive, and Harmless’ Ways to Reduce Pain During Cystoscopy
Best Practices
A systematic review uncovers ways to reduce the pain of flexible cystoscopy without the use of drugs.
4 Reasons Urologists, Procurement Managers Would Switch to Single-Use Cystoscopes
Emerging Technologies
The authors of a May study investigated worldwide market readiness of single-use flexible cystoscopes through a survey of urologists and procurement managers in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the United States.
More From Single-Use Endoscopy

Emerging Technologies

Physicians, researchers, and other industry professionals will gather in San Diego for Digestive Disease Week 2022 after the COVID-19 pandemic forced the event to go virtual each of the past two years.

5 Things Urologists Were Talking About at AUA 2022

Endoscopy Tech

Patient engagement and advancing diversity in urologic oncology were among the topics probed over three days in New Orleans as the American Urology Association held its annual meeting.

A Matter of Time: Shifting the Healthcare Paradigm With Single-Use

Emerging Technologies

At DeviceTalks Boston, med-tech executives talk of a day when single-use endoscopy is the standard of care and reusable endoscopes are “hanging in a museum.”